Legal Opinion

Smith v. First National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1895No. 5666PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the district court of Dawes county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action in replevin by the plaintiffs in error, partners doing business as M. E. Smith & Co., to recover the possession of certain goods which, it was claimed, had been obtained from them by C. F. Yates & Co. by fraud, and which had passed into the hands of the First National Bank of Chadron under a chattel mortgage given by Yates & Co. to the bank. The action was brought under the same form of petition and upon the same theory as the cases of Tootle v. First Nat. Bank of Chadron, 34 Neb., 863, and McKinney v. First Nat. Bank of Chadron, 36 Neb., 629. The case arose out…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Village of OgalallaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Mills County Nat. Bank v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Tootle v. First Natl. BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peoples Bank v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Clough v. North Central Gas Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bank of College View v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hornberger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API