Comstock Investment Corp. v. Kaniksu Resort
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
The Court’s prior opinion, dated September 11, 1989, is hereby withdrawn.
BURNETT, Judge.
This appeal arises from a sale of personal property to satisfy a lien for services under I.C. § 45-805. The statute provides that a lienholder must pay the property owner any difference between the “proceeds of the sale” and the debt (including costs) secured by the lien. In this case, however, the district court has entered a judgment requiring the lienholder to pay a difference based not upon the “proceeds of the sale” but upon the full market value of the property. For reasons…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- MacK Financial Corp. v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Gunnell v. Largilliere Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Farrell v. BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jahnke v. Mesa Equipment, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- Comstock Investment Corp. v. Kaniksu ResortIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lloyd v. BrenbemuehlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Villager Condominium Ass'n v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Villager Condominium Ass'n v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992