Legal Opinion
Comstock Investment Corp. v. Kaniksu Resort
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1990No. 17245Published
1Opinion of the Court
793 P.2d 222 (1990)
117 Idaho 990
COMSTOCK INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
KANIKSU RESORT, Howard H. Gatlin and Jane Doe Gatlin, husband and wife, John Doe Peterson and Jane Doe Peterson, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 17245.
Court of Appeals of Idaho.
May 2, 1990.
Thomas E. Cooke, Cooke, Lamanna, Smith & Cogswell, Priest River, for defendants-appellants.
James H. Paulsen, Sandpoint, for plaintiff-respondent.
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
The Court's prior opinion, dated September 11, 1989, is hereby withdrawn.
BURNETT, Judge.
This appeal arises from a sale of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- MacK Financial Corp. v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Gunnell v. Largilliere Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Farrell v. BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.