Legal Opinion
Lockling v. Wiswell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 2, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Charles Lockling, brought this action to recover damages for the death1 of his intestate. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the case comes here on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of a motion for a directed verdict, to the admission of certain evidence, and to a portion of the judge’s charge.
The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff was as follows: On June 28, 1941, at about 9:15 p.m., the defendant was driving his automobile in the direction of Neponset on the Old Colony Parkway in South Boston at a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sargent v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kralik v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Rocha v. AlberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lovett v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Falvey v. HamelburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Shaw v. Boston American League Baseball Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- McGovern v. TinglofMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Cleary v. St. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Sluckus v. FraktmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.