Legal Opinion

Keith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1910No. 356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment preferred in the District Court of Taylor County, on the 10th day of September, 1909, with engaging in the business and occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in said county after the sale of intoxicating liquors had been therein prohibited in accordance with law.

When the case was called for trial appellant moved to quásh the indictment, because same does not charge an offense, in that it does not clearly state and allege that said defendant was engaged in and pursuing the occupation and business of selling intoxicating liquors except as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Snearley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Snead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Blades v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sutphen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Slack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API