Roberts v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of engaging in the business of selling intoxicating liquor in Collin County.
1. His first contention is that the indictment is not sufficient to charge him with a violation of the statute. Under decisions he cites his contention is correct. Keith v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 418, 126 S. W. Rep., 569; Sutphen v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 500, 129 S. W. Rep., 144; Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226, 128 S. W. Rep., 125; Riggins v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 311, 135 S. W. Rep., 126; Chapa v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 365, 132 S. W.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fitch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Slack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- McGinnis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Parkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Means v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948