Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1911No. 886Published

The opinion states the case.

1DissentDavidson, Presiding Judge

(dissenting).—My brethren affirmed the judgment holding the facts sufficient. From this I dissent. It is the rule that in statutory offenses the indictment must set out by proper averment every ingredient of the offense sought to be charged. This is now and has always been the rule without interruption in Texas, from Bush v. Republic, 1 Texas Rep., 455, and Burch v. Republic, in the same volume, page 608, to and inclusive of Keith v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 418; Snead v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 583, and Sutphen v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 500, 129 S. W. Rep., 144. This is not only…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. GarbuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. State v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hewitt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API