Legal Opinion

Ferrellgas, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2001No. Nos. 00-55338, 00-55451, 00-55470; D.C. No. CV-94-00060-RTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (“Hartford”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment ruling that the primary insurance policy and its endorsements (collectively the “Policy”) issued to Penn Central Corporation and its subsidiaries obligated Hartford to pay $2 million in excess of the deductible. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Bal-int v. Carson City, 180 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc).

An insurance policy is a contract and interpreted in accordance “with the rules of construction applicable to contracts.” Montrose Chem. Corp. v. Admiral Ins.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API