Legal Opinion
Lilyerd v. Carlson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1993No. C2-91-657PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
The two consolidated cases from which this appeal is taken raise questions concerning the right of first refusal statute, Minn.Stat. § 500.24, subd. 6 (1992). J. Ralph Lilyerd and Christel Lilyerd (Li-lyerds) have sought in this litigation to establish that they, individually, have a right of first refusal, which was denied to them, to acquire from E. Jerome Carlson (Carlson) the approximately 3,536 areas of land in Kanabec County to which Big Meadow Ranch, Inc. (Big Meadow), the corporation of which they are the sole shareholders, previously held fee title subject to five…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roepke v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- In Re Franklin Signal Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. StangeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Paul Martin Walser Philip Martin McLaughlin v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.