Legal Opinion

Stone v. Dowling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Bill by Richard Stone and Ransom E. Hall against Thomas W. Dowling, George S. Trevor, and Samuel Ellsworth, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainants, defendant Trevor appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This bill is filed to enforce a mechanic’s lien for labor and materials furnished in painting a house in course of construction by defendant Dowling, as contractor for defendant Trevor, the owner of the property. Complainants were subcontractors under Dowling. Defendant Ellsworth was another lien claimant, whose claim is settled, and is out of the case. Complainants were partners, and agreed with Dowling, the contractor, to paint the house' for $30. They did so, both working on the job. They were never paid, but Stone was given an order for $30 on Walter M. Trevor, the agent of defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. McLellanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pecard v. Peter Home & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Battjes Fuel & Building Material Co. v. MilanowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Jackson v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Nachtegall v. ReilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In Re Cook EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Keister v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API