Pecard v. Peter Home & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gogebic. (Haire, J.) Garnishment proceedings. Defendant brings error from a money judgment entered against it as a claimant summoned under Act No. 175, Laws of 1885. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 21st day of February, 1890, the plaintiffs brought an action before James George, justice of the peace, against James Eslick, and on the 28th of February, 1890, recovered a judgment of $23.36 and $5 costs. On the 3d of February, 1891, an affidavit was filed and garnishee summons issued against the Federal Iron Mining Company, the affidavit stating on information and belief that the mining company was indebted to the defendant Eslick. This garnishee summons was returnable on the 12th day of February, 1891, and on that day the mining company appeared by E. Stepan, “ captain" of the above…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Stone v. DowlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Keister v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Toner v. TonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908