Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. McLellan
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1889PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Error to Wayne. (HosmeT, J.) Garnishment proceedings. Plaintiff brings error upon judgment in favor of garnishee defendants. The> facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are* stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
May 16, 1888, the plaintiff sued out a writ of attachment against the principal defendant, George Kennedy, in the circuit court for Wayne county. As a basis for such writ, she made affidavit that he was indebted to her in the sum of $2,500, as near as she could estimate the same, over and above all legal set-offs, and that the same was due upon implied contract; and that—
“ She had good reasons to believe that the said George Kennedy is not a resident of the State of Michigan, and has not resided therein for three months immediately preceding the time of making this affidavit.”
The writ was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lyon v. BallentineMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Markham v. GehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Adams v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Battjes Fuel & Building Material Co. v. MilanowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Fewell v. American Surety Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1902
- Stone v. DowlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.