Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for the construction of a will. ■

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

This action is brought to construe the will of ¡Nathan Clark, deceased, in reference to the trusts created by the' second and third clauses thereof.

Said clauses are as follows, to-wit:

“ Second. I give and bequeath to my grandson. ■ Harrison Clark, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) to be held in trust for him by my-son Nathan Clark, Percy B. Heilner and Gilbert Holmes Crawford, until he shall have arrived at the age of' thirty years,- when said trustees or their successors shall pay over to him the principal of this bequest, together with such additions thereto as may then be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Goebel v. . WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Greene v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Vanderpoel v. . LoewNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Everitt v. . EverittNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Pabst v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. In re the Estate of GablerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. Keating v. KeatingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API