Legal Opinion

China Doll Restaurant, Inc. v. MacDonald

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1962No. 2945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge.

A restaurant corporation appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict in a tort action in favor of appellee, a customer, for damages for food poisoning allegedly sustained by her as a result of the “careless and negligent serving of food that was not fit for human consumption.”

At the trial appellee testified that she went to the appellant restaurant with a friend where they ordered, among other things, won ton soup. Appellee complained to the waitress that “it didn’t taste good,” but she consumed half of it. Early the next morning she suffered pains and active nausea.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goldman & Freiman Bottling Co. v. SindellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. King v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  4. Pauline Loketch v. Capital Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Lohse v. CoffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Benjamin v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API