Legal Opinion
Exton Development v. Sun Oil Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 4, 1987No. 1538PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order sustaining appellees’ preliminary objections and dismissing appellees as additional defendants. Appellees challenged their joinder on the grounds that appellant failed to comply with the time requirements for joinder of additional defendants set forth in Pa.R.C.P. 2253.
Plaintiff, Exton Development, commenced this action against original defendants, Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania, Sun Company, Inc. and Sun Refining and Marketing Company (Sun Oil), seeking to recover damages for the alleged contamination of plaintiff’s water supply as a result of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kovalesky v. Esther Williams Swimming PoolsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Welch Foods, Inc. v. Bishopric Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- NPW Medical Center of N.E. Penna., Inc. v. LS Design Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glabbatz v. Terminal Freight Handling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- White v. American Honda Research of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Knecht v. Durso, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2000
- Reliant Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Hall, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2011
- Valentine v. Mickiewicz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1998