Legal Opinion
Kovalesky v. Esther Williams Swimming Pools
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 5, 1985No. 02855, 02868PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
These appeals are from the lower court’s October 12, 1984 order (1) refusing and dismissing the motion of defendants, Donald A. Cerene and Lawrence Becker (Cerene and Becker), for leave to join an additional defendant nunc pro tunc; and (2) refusing and dismissing the motion of defendants, Esther Williams Swimming Pools, c/o P & M Distributors (Esther Williams), and Aluminum Shapes, Inc. (Aluminum Shapes), for leave to join an additional defendant nunc pro tunc.1 For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
On June 27, 1982, plaintiff Richard P. Kovalesky (Kovalesky) fell into a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Zakian v. LILJESTRANDSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Coppage v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Martinelli v. MulloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Moore v. Howard P. Foley Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hill v. Trailmobile, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- National Liberty Life Insurance v. Kling PartnershipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- NPW Medical Center of N.E. Penna., Inc. v. LS Design Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Riccobono v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Prime Properties Development Corp. v. BinnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.