Legal Opinion

Durham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1978No. 39228PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion to set aside a 1965 conviction and 35 year sentence for statutory *674rape. The grounds for relief asserted in movant’s first amended motion and carried forward in his brief on appeal center around the allegedly illegal and unconstitutional use at movant’s trial of the record of seven previous convictions for which mov-ant had received pardons from the Governor of Missouri in 1963. These pardoned convictions were used to invoke the provisions of the Habitual Criminal Act, § 556.-280 RSMo. 1959, as amended Laws 1959, S.B. No.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Daniel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Regions Bank Trust DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Worley v. WhaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Durham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API