Legal Opinion

State on Behalf of Hendrix v. Waters

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 17, 1998No. 38526-7-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

Michael Waters appeals the trial court’s parentage judgment and order because it conditioned his visitation rights to his son upon ceasing his daily, daylong marijuana use. Because Waters claims he uses marijuana as part of his Rastafarian religious practices, he asserts that the trial court’s decision, in the absence of showing any actual or potential harm to his child’s best interests, violates his right to free religious exercise.

Because we find the First Amendment does not excuse Mr. Waters from complying with Washington’s marijuana prohibition, the trial court appropriately considered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BalzerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. State v. Gonzales-MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API