Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzales-Morales

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 29, 1998No. 40063-1-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

— In Jairo Gonzales-Morales’s trial for second degree assault, the court appointed an interpreter to facilitate Gonzales-Morales’s communications with his attorney. When a Spanish-speaking witness for the State testified, the court “borrowed” Gonzales-Morales’s court-appointed interpreter to translate the State’s witness’s testimony. If Gonzales-Morales wished to speak to his attorney during this time, he was to request a recess from the court. He did not do so, and the jury returned a guilty verdict.

On appeal, Gonzales-Morales alleges this use of his interpreter violated both his Sixth…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzales-MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Gonzales-MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. Ochoa-MaganaColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. SelallaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. SelallaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API