Popp v. Daisy Gold Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Third District Court Tooele County. Hon. A. N. Cherry, Judge. From an order appointing a receiver pendente lite defendant company appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMiner, J.
This appeal is prosecuted by the defendant from an order pendente lite appointing a receiver to take charge of the property of the defendant consisting of mining claims until the further order of the court. The application for the appointment of the receiver was based upon 'avermentp in the complaint. An undertaking was filed in accordance with the statute. The appellant filed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled, and this appeal was prosecuted.
Subd. 5 of Sec. 3114 R. S., 1898, provides that a receiver may. be appointed by a court or judge in cases where a corporation has been…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Lodge v. TwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dainese v. KendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Oldroyd v. McCreaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Honerine Min. & Mill. Co. v. Tallerday Steel Pipe & Tank Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
- Shurtz v. ThorleyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Park v. FurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.