Dainese v. Kendall
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM.-THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT ÓE COLUMBIA. This was a motion to dismiss. The case is stated in the-' opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Ohiee Justice "Waite
delivered the opinion of the-court.
When this case was called for hearing a motion was madó to dismiss because the decree appealed^ from was not a final decree. The facts are these:
The bill was filed by Dainese as the holder of one of three, notes of Gordon, secured by a deed of trust from Gordon to ’ McPherson, trustee, against the maker of the notes, the trustee, and John E. Kendall the holder of the other notes, praying:
1. That a sale which had been made of the trust property by McPherson, the trustee acting under the deed of trust, to Kendall, be set aside and a new…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mower v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by32 opinions
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- McAuslan v. McAuslanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
- Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Lodge v. TwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bank of Rondout v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.