Bell ex rel. Fidelity Ins. v. Freeman
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
The complaint claims damages for breach of warranty as to title in the sale of an automobile by defendant to L. W. Bell.
Defendant, appearing specially, for that purpose only, filed pleas in abatement 1 and 2, which were “denied” by the court. Defendant amended said pleas 1 and 2 and filed additional pleas in abatement 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Plaintiff amended his complaint to read, “L. W. Bell, suing for the use of Fidelity Insurance Company of Tennessee, a Corporation, plaintiff.”
Defendant refiled his pleas in abatement to the complaint as amended. Demurrer was filed to the pleas, but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brooklyn Life Insurance v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Phenix Insurance v. Pennsylvania RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Central Bank and Trust Co. v. First Northwest BankDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
- United Bonding Insurance Co. v. WS Newell, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- United Bonding Insurance Co. v. WS Newell, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969