People v. Palmer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
On this appeal we address an all-too-recurring issue, the trial court’s failure to give defendant-requested instructions specifically directing the jury’s attention to evidence from which it may find reasonable doubt. In light of the general holding in People v. Sears (1970) 2 Cal.3d 180, 190 [84 Cal.Rptr. 711, 465 P.2d 847], and the precise admonition of People v. Hall (1980) 28 Cal.3d 143, 159, 160 [167 Cal.Rptr. 844, 616 P.2d 826], on the duty to give requested special instructions relating to the reliability of eyewitness identifications in appropriate cases, we are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CromedySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- People v. GaglioneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. MarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.