Legal Opinion

Lieblien v. Hansen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Houghton; Cooper, J., presiding. Summary proceedings by Edward M. Lieblien against Hans G. Hansen and. another who appealed to the circuit court from an order of restitution entered by the commissioner. Judgment for complainant. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

On November 8, 1911, complainant instituted summary proceedings against defendants under section 11164, 3 Comp. Laws, before a circuit court commissioner of Houghton county, to recover possession of lots numbered 36 and 37, block 13, in Second addition to the village of Calumet, now called Laurium. From a judgment by the commissioner in complainant’s favor, appeal was taken to the circuit court of Houghton county, where on trial by jury a verdict was directed in favor of complainant and judgment rendered thereon. A motion by defendants for a new trial was denied, and the case then removed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Allen v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Butler v. BertrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Frisbee v. FrisbeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCreery v. RoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gerasimos v. Continental BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In Re Sarras EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Shelby Co. v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API