Legal Opinion
Risch v. Royal Oak Police Department
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2009No. 18-1903PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Karyn Risch (“Risch”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendanb-Appellee Royal Oak Police Department (“the Department”), on Risch’s gender-discrimination claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. In 2005, Risch, a uniformed patrol officer and seventeen-year veteran of the Department, was passed over for a promotion to the position of detective in favor of two male applicants who had lower scores than Risch under the promotion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Peggy Blizzard v. Marion Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Bazzi v. City of DearbornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Perlean Griffin v. Carleton FinkbeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Paula Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Karen Kenney v. Aspen Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.