Legal Opinion

Remington v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1984No. SC S30150PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Remington challenges a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for an initiative that would amend the Oregon Constitution. The proposed amendment states:

“BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OREGON:
“The Constitution of the State of Oregon is amended by creating a new section to be known as Section 41, Article I and to read: Section 41.
“No court and no provision of this constitution shall exclude reliable evidence in a criminal prosecution because of a violation of any provision of this Constitution.”

The Attorney General prepared a ballot title composed of a caption,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bartels v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Crabtree v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Herron v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carley/Towers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Crabtree v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Morgan v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Herron v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stanwood v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API