Legal Opinion

Herron v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1984No. SC S30152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This petition concerns the same ballot title as we examined in Remington v. Paulus, 296 Or 317, 675 P2d 485 (1984). The petitioner argues that the original title was insufficient or unfair in that the caption stated the effect of the proposed measure, only the explanation informed voters that this is a proposed constitutional amendment, it referred to constitutional provisions by number, rather than using words to describe their principles and the second sentence of the explanation misrepresented the constitutional implications of the measure. We believe we have answered all of her objections…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Remington v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wells v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Remington v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API