Legal Opinion

Rosumny v. Marks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1926PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The plaintiff contends that at the time the motion for a new trial was granted the Circuit Court had lost jurisdiction of the cause for the reason that the motion was not determined during the September term of court, at which the judgment was entered, nor during the succeeding October term of court, and there was no order made or entered extending the time in which to hear and determine the motion for a new trial during the September term or October term of the Circuit Court.

It appears from the bill of exceptions that the motion for a new trial was called to the attention of the court during…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tuohy v. Columbia Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Jones v. SinsheimerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Henrichsen v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Loggie v. Interstate Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Cicrich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wells v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API