Legal Opinion

Sophos v. Hibbs (In re Hibbs)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided October 26, 1993No. Bankruptcy No. LA 93-10829 KM; Adv. No. LA 93-02303 KMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KATHLEEN P. MARCH, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This opinion rules on cross-motions for summary judgment. The cross-motions are *261made in a nondischargeability adversary proceeding brought by plaintiff Demetrios James Sophos (Sophos) against joint debtors John William Hibbs (Mr. Hibbs) and Sandra Burris Hibbs (Mrs. Hibbs), who are husband and wife.

Plaintiff Sophos’ motion for summary judgment seeks to hold a federal judgment for intentional copyright infringement nondis-chargeable as to both Mr. and Mrs. Hibbs pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).1…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paik v. Lee (In re Lee)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Brown v. Kastner (In Re Kastner)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API