Legal Opinion

Shine Laundry, Inc. v. Washington Loan & Banking Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1965No. 41626PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

For the purpose of this case the difference between a mortgage and a deed to secure debt is immaterial. Stapler v. Anderson, 177 Ga. 434, 435 (170 SE 498). Therefore, for convenience we will sometimes refer to the grantor of a deed to secure debt as the “mortgagor” and the grantee of a deed to secure debt as the “mortgagee.”

It is the law in Georgia, as in other jurisdictions, that when the owner of property encumbered by a mortgage or a deed to secure debt, transfers his interest in the property to another, and the holder of the mortgage or deed to secure debt by agreement with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stapler v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Alropa Corp. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Luke v. CrumleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  4. Jobson v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Manders v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Thomas v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Randolph County v. Settles Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API