Luke v. Crumley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
“ ‘A general demurrer to a petition will not be sustained if the facts entitle the plaintiff to any of the substantial relief prayed.’ Arteaga v. Arteaga, 169 Ga. 595 (4) (151 S. E. 5).” Wallace v. Wallace, 213 Ga. 96 (2) (97 S. E. 2d 155); Bowles v. White, 206 Ga. 433 (57 S. E. 2d 547); Lowery v. Browning, 212 Ga. 586 (94 S. E. 2d 413); Security Feed & Seed Co. of Thomasville v. NeSmith, 213 Ga. 783 (2) (102 S. E. 2d 37).
The demurrer to the original petition was a general demurrer on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action. After the amendment to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arteaga v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Ansley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Hand v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Tolbert v. ShortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landers v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Shine Laundry, Inc. v. Washington Loan & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Williamson v. Floyd County Wildlife Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Daughtry v. DaughtrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Luke v. CrumleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961