Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Panetta
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 30, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1738PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the motion by the defendants Patrick Keough and William Desautels (“Individual Defendants”) for reconsideration of this Court’s October 27, 2011, 277 F.R.D. 33 (D.D.C. 2011) Memorandum Opinion and Order denying their motion pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the entry of final judgment on the dismissed claims against them. See ECF Nos. 42 and 43, October 27, 2011, 277 F.R.D. 33 Memorandum Opinion and Order. The plaintiff Lisa Stewart opposes this motion. For the reasons explained…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blackman v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Building Industry Ass'n of Superior California v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ali v. Carnegie Institution of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- FBME Bank Ltd. v. MnuchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lyles v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.