Legal Opinion
Ali v. Carnegie Institution of Washington
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 26, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-2030PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Statement Regarding Filing Date, Denying Plaintiff’s Alternative Request to File Nunc Pro Tunc, & Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration or Leave to Amend
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se Plaintiff Mussa Ali initiated this matter in September 2012 by filing suit against the Carnegie Institution of Washington (“Carnegie”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. Mr. Ali alleged that he was erroneously omitted as an inventor on multiple U.S. patents co-owned by…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lovely-Coley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lucas v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bernier v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lopez v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.