Floyd County v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Floyd District Court. — Hon. C. H. Kelly, Judge. Action to recover on account of moneys expended for tbe support of the insane ward in the State hospital. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
In the year 1898 the defendant Ernestina Wolfe, was married to one Louis Wolfe. In 1895 they became possessed of a house and lot in Charles City, Iowa, which they occupied as a home until the year 1900, when the said Ernestina was adjudged insane, and committed to the State hospital provided for such unfortunates.., Since that time the plaintiff Flbyd County has expended for her sup*750port in said institution the sum of $733.50, no part of which has been repaid. In the year 1905 Louis Wolfe brought suit in the district court of Floyd county to annul said marriage, on the ground that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Patterson v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Sheehy v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Parsons v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Arnold v. WaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tanton v. State National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Hoadley v. HoadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. Takes (In Re Takes)District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- Hanrahan v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
- In re Estate of James, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.