Legal Opinion

Tanton v. State National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1935No. 6157PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This care is fully stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (43 S. W. (2d) 957), and we deem it unnecessary to here restate it.

We granted a writ of error with the notation that we would hear the case. In doing so we had in mind the conflict stated in the application between the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in the instant case and that in the case of Dorrough *18v. Panse, 24 S. W. (2d) 69. In the last named case the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District (Texarkana) held that land which had become a homestead because of the existence of the marital relation, and exempt…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woods v. Alvarado State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Johnson v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Bahn v. StarckeTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brady v. KreugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Whitmire v. MayTexas Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Southland Royalty Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Johnson v. WoodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  3. Johnson v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Burk Royalty Company v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Environmental Processing Systems, L.C. v. Fpl Farming Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API