Garcia v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of murder, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.02(a)(1) (Vernon 1989), further found that he was a habitual offender, and assessed punishment at 99 years’ confinement. The trial court added a finding that appellant used a deadly weapon. By seven points of error, appellant attacks the charge, claims the evidence insufficient to support a finding that he used a firearm, claims that the prosecution improperly suppressed material evidence, and challenges the affirmative finding on use of a deadly weapon. We reform and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
By…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- K.W.G., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Juhasz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Charlie McIntosh Massey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- Christopher Zambrano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.