Legal Opinion

Bray v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1994No. B075903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

— Kenneth Bray (Bray), a discharged employee, sought workers’ compensation benefits, alleging industrial injury to his nerves, psyche and internal system caused by termination from his employment. The workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) awarded him compensation. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) rescinded the award on the grounds that Bray’s injury was not one “arising out of and in the course of the employment,” as required by Labor Code section 3600, subdivision (a). While it is true that an employee’s termination is a matter which occurs in the course of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Livitsanos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muller v. Automobile Club of So. CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Tamrac, Inc. v. California Ins. Guarantee Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Tamrac, Inc. v. CALIFORNIA INS. GUAR. ASSN.California Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API