Legal Opinion

In re Cicardo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 2, 2004No. 2004-B-0828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary matter arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Vincent Ross Cicardo, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The underlying facts of this matter are not disputed. On March 26, 2002, respondent, through counsel, reported to the ODC that he had periodically used funds in his client trust account for the operation of his law office. A subsequent audit of the trust account for the period January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2001 confirmed that respondent- withdrew funds from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. La. State Bar Ass'n v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  4. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. In re HernandezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re KellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. In re AlexSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  3. In re WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API