Legal Opinion

Vayiar v. Vic Tanny International

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1982No. Docket 54621PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

Defendants appeal by leave granted on February 13, 1981, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board ordering defendants to pay workers’ compensation benefits to plaintiff.

Plaintiff Mario Vayiar was employed as a butler for Roy Zurkowski, defendant Vic Tanny International’s owner, for a number of years. Zurkowski’s marriage in 1972 allegedly led to increased tension for plaintiff on the job,1 allegedly culminating in a *390heart attack. After several weeks of hospitalization, plaintiff returned to work for several months before resigning in 1976, at the age of 62.

A short…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Crampton v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pitoniak v. Borman’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Hofley Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ratliff v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Williams v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kent County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API