Williams v. Chrysler Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Chrysler Corporation appeals by leave granted the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirming the findings of a referee that plaintiff was entitled to workers’ compensation because he suffered from a work-related lung disability. We reverse and remand.
Chrysler first claims the wcab misapplied the applicable legal standards when it concluded that petitioner suffered a work-related lung condition. Chrysler claims that the wcab used proof of plaintiffs disability to support its conclusion that plaintiffs injury was work-related. See Kostamo v Marquette Iron Mining Co, 405 Mich…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Crampton v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. Hofley Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Gilroy v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Findley v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sellers v. HauchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.