Legal Opinion

Williams v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1987No. Docket 88959PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Chrysler Corporation appeals by leave granted the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirming the findings of a referee that plaintiff was entitled to workers’ compensation because he suffered from a work-related lung disability. We reverse and remand.

Chrysler first claims the wcab misapplied the applicable legal standards when it concluded that petitioner suffered a work-related lung condition. Chrysler claims that the wcab used proof of plaintiffs disability to support its conclusion that plaintiffs injury was work-related. See Kostamo v Marquette Iron Mining Co, 405 Mich…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Crampton v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. Hofley Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gilroy v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Findley v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Sellers v. HauchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API