Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 2016No. G052440PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J. —

The issue presented herein is whether an appellate court is required to independently review the appellate record for the existence of meritorious issues in a matter where the superior court extended the civil commitment of an individual previously found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI), when the individual’s appointed counsel informs the court he or she has found no arguable issues on appeal, and the client has been notified of that fact, and was given the chance to file a brief, but did not raise any issues on appeal. While appellate courts have such an obligation in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. People v. Boggs CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API