Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1944No. 262Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

321 U.S. 275 (1944)

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. ET AL.

v.

RAY-O-VAC COMPANY.

No. 262.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 2, 3, 1944.

Decided February 28, 1944.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

Messrs. William E. Chilton and Albert R. Golrick for petitioners.

Messrs. Bernard A. Schroeder and Gerhard A. Gesell, with whom Messrs. Russell Wiles and Charles J. Merriam were on the brief, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · RobertsJustice Roberts

This case involves the validity and alleged infringement of the Anthony Patent No. 2,198,423, issued April 23, 1940. The District Court held the patent…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API