City of Anaheim v. Langenberger
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
—This action is brought to quiet the title-to a certain tract of land situated within the limits of the city of Anaheim. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order denying its motion for a new trial.
Defendant’s predecessor in interest platted a certain tract of land within the limits of the city of Anaheim, by dividing it into lots, blocks, etc., and filed the plat or map thereof in the office of the county recorder of the county. Thereafter he sold a number of lots to various parties, describing them by reference to the aforesaid recorded plat. This defendant, his successor in interest,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Sacramento v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Los Angeles v. KysorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Schmitt v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Eltinge v. SantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kirkland v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- City of Santa Clara v. IvancovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.