Legal Opinion

W & L Sales Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1989No. Appeal 225 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

The issue presented in this appeal is whether W & L Sales Co., Inc. (Employer) and its insurer, PMA Insurance Co. (collectively Petitioners) are required to seek reimbursement of overpayments of workmen’s compensation benefits paid to Toby L. Drake (Claimant) from the Workmen’s Compensation Supersedeas Fund 1 or whether they may deduct the overpayments from Claimant’s future payments of compensation. The referee’s order allowing deductions from future compensation payments was reversed by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board). We affirm the Board’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth, Bureau of Worker's Compensation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. General v. E. Roseman Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. W & L Sales Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Santarelli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kiebler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Lincoln Party ex rel. Robinson v. General AssemblyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Murphy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Deak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API