Legal Opinion
Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided April 27, 2017No. Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-00371PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial (Dkt. #337). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court denies Defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
On June 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed the instant action against Defendants, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,271,884 (the “’884 Patent”), 7,092,029 (the “’029 Patent”), and 6,836,290 (the “’290 Patent”). On February 8, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finalrod IP, LLC v. Endurance Lift Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
- Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2020