Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (the “Commission”), through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Mary land Rule 16-751, 1 as a result of two complaints received with respect to Wayne M. Mitchell, the respondent, filed against him a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action. In that petition, it was alleged that the respondent violated Rules 1.1 (Competence); 2 1.3 (Diligence); 3 1.4 (Communication); 4 1.15 (Safekeeping Property); 5 5.4 (Professional Independence of a Lawyer); 6 5.5 (Unauthorized Practice of Law); 7 7.1 (Communications Concerning a Lawyer’s services); 8 7.5 (Firm Names…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VlahosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GisrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CarithersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaignanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.