Legal Opinion
Pipe Liners, Inc. v. American Pipe & Plastics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 18, 1995No. Civ. A. G-95-279PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KENT, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement case in which Plaintiffs Pipe Liners, Incorporated (“Pipe Liners”), Hydro Conduit Corporation (“Hydro Conduit”), and Quail Pipe Corporation (“Qual Pipe”) allege that Defendants have infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 4,985,196 and 4,986,951, both of which are patent claims for installing thermoplastic pipeliners inside an existing pipe. Before the Court now is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Hydro Conduit for lack of standing to sue. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion should be DENIED.
It is undisputed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arachnid, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Merit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American CyanamidDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Site Microsurgical Systems, Inc. v. the Cooper Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. New Haven Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Beam Laser Systems, Inc. v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018