Legal Opinion

Walker Bros. v. Skliris

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1908No. 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by Walker Bros., bankers, against L. G. Skliris and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Skliris, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrion, J.

This action was commenced by the respondent, a banking corporation, to recover the sum of $250 from defendants Will Caravelis, Nicholas P. Stathakos, and L. G. Skliris, as partners doing business under the name and style of Caravelis & Co. The amount claimed was alleged to be due upon advancements made by respondent in the form of an overdraft made by the defendants aforesaid, and which, it is alleged, *356they agreed to pay to respondent. The defendants Caravelis and Stathakos presented no answer or defense to the action, but the defendant Skliris filed an answer, in which he denied generally…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Clayton v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brandley v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Neesley v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API