Legal Opinion

O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1942No. 6456PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

Plaintiff, the buyer under a real estate contract for the ■sale of real property, brought this action to rescind on the .ground of fraud and for the return of money paid on account. Defendants Hampton denied fraud and alleged by counter-claim that they had exercised their option to forfeit the contract on account of plaintiff’s default. Plaintiff replied setting up a purported estoppel. The Utah Realty and Construction Company as agents for the Hamptons denied fraud. The Court gave judgment for the defendants on this counterclaim and against plaintiff on her charge of fraud.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Warnock Insurance Agency v. Peterson Real Estate Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Alhambra Transfer & Storage Co. v. MuseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Hecla Gold Mining Co. v. GisbornUtah Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sorenson v. BeersUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ahrendt v. BOBBITTUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. United States v. Colombine Coal CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API