Legal Opinion

Golston v. Bartlett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 12, 1938No. 8511PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As concerns this appeal, appellee, G. F. Bartlett, sued appellants, D. B. Dozier and Roy D. Golston, for $12,000, alleged to be the reasonable cost of drilling an oil or gas well on land described as the Campbell lease; and for cancellation of an assignment of an undivided one-half interest in the lease, executed in consideration of drilling the well. Dozier and Golston each filed a disclaimer of any interest in the lease; and the court decreed it to be the property of appellee. The jury found that $10,000 would have been the reasonable cost of drilling the well, and judgment was rendered for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. StuardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. PendarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Cotherman v. Oriental Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riddle v. LanierTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fite v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Continental Transfer & Storage Company v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Birmingham v. LindemannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Duncan v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API